Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages

• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Says the hypocrite that says one tool that replaces humans is okay, but not another.

  Okay buddy, just because you can’t make a coherent argument or come up with a legitimate reason why one’s acceptable doesn’t make me slow. If anything just shows how flawed and fucked your reasoning is.

  People have always used tools to replace humans. So this decry NOW over ai is what’s bullshit. They shouldn’t enable to use PS brush tools either. Same process, same outcome, the ai can actually be able to do more and remove labor. But now “that’s” not okay. This is what me and other users are pointing out.

  But your “ai bad” bias, has made you ignorant to any actual discussions.

  source

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    You’re not even arguing at this point, you’re just repeating false claims I already debunked as if saying things louder might make you more correct.

    source

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      What have you debunked?

      The same “repeating” can be said to you, and is probably why you’re projecting more fallacies onto me.

      Ant “debunking” you’ve done, is to justify your bias that certain tools to replace humans are okay. And that’s obviously a hypocrital take, so what’s your real issue here? Just like anyone else, the term “ai” is just a trigger and you don’t like it? It to have it poured to your already “acceptable” tools make you go “REE”?

      These same conversations were had with luddites like you when spellcheck came out, than PS, than grammarly. And guess what? They’re acceptable in everyday use.

      The same will happen with AI as people treat more like a tool than a toy. Than jackasses like you will be left behind again, but then try and justify it like you are beee when the next one comes out.

      Hypocritical Luddites like you are just the worst kind of fucking people.

      source