Comment

BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

No not at all there are limits to free speech for example screeming fire in a packed theatre.

I don’t think it should be in the hands of individuals but it should probably be community based idk, maybe through voting or some better system. like a sort of distributed moderation instead of centralized.

source

Sort:hotnew top

CaptObvious@literature.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
How much more distributed do you want it?

source
- BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  What i mean like the jury system were 12 random users for example might be picked and then they get to vote on a case.
  
  source
  - CaptObvious@literature.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    So no judge? How do we make sure that the jury follows the rules?
    
    source
    BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I’m not sure tbh
    
    source
- BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I think something were there was a jury system, part of your social media experience would be to sit jury for a queue of cases. and you just vote by button press along with 12 others to decide on bans and the like.
  
  source
  - CaptObvious@literature.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Who plays the judge in this judicial system?
    
    source
    FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    this guy:
    
    Image
    
    Why? because that’s a great cosplay, and frankly, he looks fun.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
    BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    good question.
    
    source