It’s a funny thing what game publishers sometimes try to do when it comes to releasing games early to internet streamers as a way to boost interest in their games. I’ve heard stories of all kinds of crazy stipulations that streamers have to sign off on contractually in order to get access to the game. They can only show certain parts of the game, or they can only play so far into it, or they have guardrails put up around what they can and cannot say about the game they are showing off to the public. What tends to get lost in all of this is that these streamers are essentially an advertising channel to generate more hype about these future games, yet they’re treated like some kind of a threat.
Talk is cheap. Until we see action, nothing has changed.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 7 months ago
Ooh, corporate gaslighting! “Your fee fees are hurt because you didn’t actually understand the message correctly!”
There is no miscommunication here. The message is clear as day - “don’t criticise our product”.
Given the content of the clause, NetEase is simply lying…
…and they’re fully aware that they’re lying, otherwise they wouldn’t be trying to make the clause less unpalatable.
My sides went into orbit.