Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

In the last 1000 years we have not advanced as a species. We are just as tribal, dogmatic and reactionary as we always were. Given that scientists are people too, will science save us?

⁨9⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨cameron_vale@lemm.ee⁩ to ⁨nostupidquestions@lemmy.world⁩

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Fades@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I think your perspective is far too narrow. It’s not science that must save us, science can’t do much in the face of willful ignorance and entitlement.

    Just look at global warming, the science has been there since the 70s yet we’re still walking past line after line till we reach points of no return. It’s not about the science it’s about the human element.

    Humans themselves are the problem, too divided and focused on wealth and power instead of unity and progress. No fucking shit we haven’t gotten anywhere in the last grand, we’ve been too busy killing/robbing/exploiting each other, and that WILL NEVER STOP.

    source
  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You are not going far enough back. We are genetically the same as humans for ~75,000 years ago. To all intents and purposes we are ice age hunters with smart phones.

    will science save us?

    Honestly, no. We have known about climate change and the dangers it poses for at least 50 years but we have done basically nothing.

    Science is just informing us how screwed modern civilisation is over the next 100 years.

    source
    • cameron_vale@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I was thinking less genetic and more cultural. That by good education, communication, government, diet, art… we might grow beyond our monkey nature.

      But maybe the 99% will always be a monkey.

      source
      • Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        We are animals with built in characteristics. Unless science re engineers humans, then we will never change.

        source
  • jeffw@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You think things changed until 1000 years ago?

    source
  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Scientists are egotistical too… opposed with self-promotion and citations.

    source
  • scarabic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I think you should take a look at the numbers and perhaps complexity your premise.

    source
  • Mothra@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    There’s not enough generations of humans to evolve significantly under 1000 years. Especially since we have been living under relatively no evolutionary pressure to change dogma and violence

    source
    • derekabutton@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Quite a bit of human development has been in the category of nurture, as opposed to nature. While humans have changed little biologically, I have an “appendage” in my hand that can communicate with an individual in space. Memes replicate and evolve much more quickly than genes do.

      source
      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Yes but the change is not permanent. It dies with you.

        All you would need is for the change not to be passed on to the next generation and all that progress is lost.

        We currently spend decades passing on that knowledge to each child.

        If that ever stops, the progress disappears in one generation.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Mothra@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        While it is true that we have collectively made significant progress with technology, (if that’s what you mean by “nurture”) it hasn’t changed our aggressive behaviour as a species which is what OP was questioning. Sure, we have made significant changes culturally, technologically, and with memes- so what?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Well, individuals only get 80 years. So you get what we have here.

    source