[deleted]

Comments

• RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  What do you expect them to put. The truth? Yeah, “I’m doing this search to find my ex wife so I can murder her. This isn’t admissible in court, right?”. That’ll go great.

  source

  • stoy@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I am not expecting them to do that, I am expecting them to make an effort at pretending to follow the rules.

    source

    • huf@hexbear.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      they are following the rules though. this is what it looks like when cops follow the rules for cops.

      source
  • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The truth is that they’re not held accountable so the input field doesn’t matter at all, hence the sarcastic reasons entered.

    source
  • Hirom@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The blog post’s conclusion suggest an answer:

    If police want the power to track a person’s movements, they must be required to convince a judge with evidence and probable cause. They should not be able to bypass the Constitution with a search for “haha.”

    source
• brownsugga@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  People just want to be left alone

  source
• ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I still remember batman using cellphones for mass surveillance one time and being so disgusted by the technology they destroyed it

  source