What do you expect them to put. The truth? Yeah, “I’m doing this search to find my ex wife so I can murder her. This isn’t admissible in court, right?”. That’ll go great.
How Cops Are Treating Mass Surveillance As a Joke: Cops Search Flock Database Typing Reasons for Searches Such as "LMAO," "LOL," and Random Keyboard Mashing
Submitted 8 hours ago by Lemmynated@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/09/high-crime-lmao-how-cops-are-treating-mass-surveillance-joke
Comments
RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 6 hours ago
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 hours ago
The truth is that they’re not held accountable so the input field doesn’t matter at all, hence the sarcastic reasons entered.
stoy@lemmy.zip 3 hours ago
I am not expecting them to do that, I am expecting them to make an effort at pretending to follow the rules.
Hirom@beehaw.org 2 hours ago
The blog post’s conclusion suggest an answer:
If police want the power to track a person’s movements, they must be required to convince a judge with evidence and probable cause. They should not be able to bypass the Constitution with a search for “haha.”
brownsugga@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
People just want to be left alone
ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 2 hours ago
I still remember batman using cellphones for mass surveillance one time and being so disgusted by the technology they destroyed it