cecilkorik
@cecilkorik@piefed.ca
- Comment on Oops - someone nearly caused a fire with the Steam Controller Puck 1 week ago:
This is a very solved problem I have no idea why the Steam controller would have an issue with it other than laziness or oversight. Don’t supply voltage and current on exposed pins until you’ve validated that thing you’re expecting to deliver voltage and current to is actually there and correctly connected. This is the whole reason the third pin usually even exists, for data/sense purposes. Add a fourth pin if you have to. It’s not rocket science.
- Comment on Lasagna dreams, spaghetti reality 1 week ago:
It would be interesting to compare what games on Steam have the highest mean, median and p90 playtime.
- Comment on It's not you, would-be Subnautica 2 fish murderers, it's our creature encounters not feeling "fair, readable, and engaging" enough, say Unknown Worlds 1 week ago:
There’s plenty of reasonable middle ground between “constantly evading relentlessly aggressive predators that ignore most attempts at distraction and cannot be damaged, discouraged, dodged or escaped or in a reasonable timeframe or with any measure of permanence” and “I want to kill every one of them until I become master of all the ocean” they just need to find it.
As a player I don’t want wholesale murder either. I won’t necessarily mind if that’s an option, but I don’t think that should be the focus. I just want more tools to deal with the situations that evolve, I don’t want hammerheads camping my base and attacking my docked tadpoles with impunity, because once they fixate on it, they will never leave and there is no way to make them go away. I don’t think having to move my base whenever one gets attracted is a reasonable ask. Perhaps it’s even realistic and fits the game lore, but it’s not fun. And fun needs to be the point. We need something to discourage and defend ourselves somehow, it doesn’t have to be lethal or even harmful, it could even be friendly. Maybe the hammerheads love to eat a particular plant and if we grow it somewhere other than our base for long enough, they’ll be attracted to wander over there and go eat it and maybe if they eat enough of it even fall asleep for awhile. There are so many possible options and I hope the devs actually understand that there is plenty of middle-ground to explore that are both non-violent and player-friendly. It doesn’t have to be a chore of burning consumables and hypervigilance from risk of death to keep it engaging. People watch fish tanks for a reason. We want to see behaviors that make sense and be able to have some limited, mild influence on those behaviors both over the short and long terms, without necessarily having absolute control.
- Comment on "Unofficial builds of Subnautica 2 are currently circulating online," Unknown Worlds confirm, just days before the ocean survival game's early access release 2 weeks ago:
To be clear it’s not “release release” it’s early access release. If you want the actual release with the full story and everything implemented you’ll be waiting a lot more than a few days.
That said people are still going to go nuts on the early access, I’m sure.
- Comment on Palantir posted a manifesto that reads like the ramblings of a comic book villain 1 month ago:
Pursuing feudalism in a country that famously loathes kings is a bold move, let’s see if it works out for them. It might seem like it’s working out for them at the moment. I’m not sure how long that’s actually going to last though. I think they are standing on top of a volcano of public anger and they don’t seem concerned about how the ground keeps rumbling because they are wearing lava-proof suits. I think when they actually get submerged in lava they are going to find they have many other weaknesses and vulnerable spots they didn’t realize and in fact “the goggles do nothing!”
- Comment on "War is our reality": 4A reveal Metro 2039, a horror FPS inspired by Russia's invasion of Ukraine 1 month ago:
Could’ve called it Metro 2026 to be honest but I guess that would be a bit too on-the-nose.
- Comment on GOG "won't be making absolute statements in either direction" about their future approach to AI use 3 months ago:
I hate these filthy Neutrals, Kif. With enemies you know where they stand but with Neutrals, who knows? It sickens me.
- Comment on AMD say the Steam Machine is "on track" for an early 2026 release 3 months ago:
It is definitely incredibly common, yes. Like I said, the laws are generally not effectively enforced, and they’re also intentionally limited. For some reason, we have decided it is totally acceptable to do that when you don’t have a recognized monopoly position, which Sony doesn’t in that market. It’s very particular, it’s very specific, and it’s very subjective, which is probably a huge part of why they aren’t effectively enforced. Also, companies know all the ways to get around the ways the laws are written if they really want to.
We still don’t really follow them even when the laws probably do apply though, it’s just vestigial at this point. We’re supposed to believe the antitrust laws were only meant for those old, bad monopolies like Standard Oil and Ma Bell. We don’t really have monopolies like that anymore, all our monopolies are the good kind of monopolies that don’t harm society, or they’re not monopolies at all, they’re coordinating oligopolies that constantly partner with and all own chunks of each other, which means they’re also perfectly fine and not any kind of bad monopoly at all.
I didn’t write the laws, there are lots of things about them that I think could be vastly improved. But I do agree with their intent, and we shouldn’t forget what their intent is, just because our current financial and political environment is not interested in them.
- Comment on AMD say the Steam Machine is "on track" for an early 2026 release 3 months ago:
I am not a lawyer, but as far as I know that’s actually incorrect, selling a product below cost is considered predatory dumping, as it means literally nobody can afford to compete with you on anything resembling a level playing field. How is any competitor supposed to release a competing product when Gabe is using his own financial resources for “eating the price spikes”. Unless you have your own financial resources or massive speculative investment, you cannot also “eat the price spikes” so your own products will have to be priced at realistic levels so that it is something that actually earns you some level of profit in order for your business to continue and grow, and thus those products will be far more expensive than Valve’s subsidized product, and thus, you probably won’t sell any unless you have some significant further advantage, which you shouldn’t need to have in order to simply compete with the market leader. That’s a clear barrier to entry, and is the definition of anti-competitive.
Usually, this would be done to lock the subsidized buyers into a particular ecosystem, or even just to bundle that ecosystem by default (aka illegal bundling, like Microsoft did for years) from which additional profit can later be expected. In Valve’s case, this would be Steam, and it pretty clearly would profit them in the long run, and this strategy also keeping all competitors out by dumping hardware below cost, thus abusing their Steam distribution monopoly to fund a second monopoly on the Steam Machines market to maintain their first monopoly. That’s literally what antitrust laws were designed for. Just because we don’t really effectively enforce them anymore I feel like people have started losing sight of what they mean and what they are supposed to be for and I don’t think we should just normalize that this is how businesses are supposed to operate.
And that’s why Valve probably won’t do that. (at least I suspect they won’t, based on my view of their history, I have no insider knowledge)
- Comment on Steam Machine price leak suggests it will cost as much as an iPhone 4 months ago:
Whether it’s true or not, I’ve heard a lot of people complaining about the possibility of a price point like this and it really blows my mind how twisted people’s expectations are about these price points. Like people line up overnight for a chance to buy iPhones, the same as the one already in their pocket but with a new function in the camera app or something, and then you get something that is almost an entirely new class of product and far more capable for the same price at a time when we’re facing unprecedented shortages, and people are pissed off about it? Double standards much?
I wish it was $200 too, but like, we don’t live in that world anymore. I’m sorry, but that world died from Covid and any medicine that could’ve cured it was lost in trade wars and its corpse was blown up in real wars. It’s not coming back.
- Comment on Why won’t Steam Machine support HDMI 2.1? Digging in on the display standard drama. 5 months ago:
Yes. DP is the right choice for civilized people.
- Comment on "GullyCricketApp" based on a reduced cricket game + 2 Business Ideas+ 1 Network Diagnostic's Tool by SATYABRATA SARKAR 5 months ago:
Ahahahaha it is $150, on sale. I think only Elon Musk would understand and enjoy this game. It is too much for me. True geniuses only.
- Comment on The Illuminator Advert - Game Boy Accessory 11 months ago:
I had one of these. It was truly terrible, extremely limited, clunky, dim, with awful battery life, but sort of better than nothing. Barely. The days before white LED backlights were a really painful time for portable electronics.