Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages

• finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Ok but why the fuck do you think it’s okay to use a wrecking ball for a task that requires a chisel? You’re creating low quality high cost work just because it’s fast and easy.

  source

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Why do you think grammarly is a thing dude…?

    People ALREADY use an llm for spellcheck, and it’s acceptable, yet this crosses a line…?

    It’s always funny what people will find acceptable, but also balk at when it’s fundamentally the exact same thing.

    Of these devs want to claim “no ai” and everything is human, than they can’t rely on spellcheck either. Both are automated tools no?

    source

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Grammarly predates commercial generative AI, as I attempted to explain to you before. It’s over a decade old. You clearly don’t understand the core mechanisms of any of these things.

      source

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        You seem to be missing the point that’s been made here since your ignorance is “ai bad”.

        A tools a tool, any tool can be abused. So it’s a very hypocrital view to say these tools are acceptable, but make up arbitrary reasons why those ones aren’t. That’s what’s being done here, and why people are trying to shift the conversation focus to the “tool itself”.

        Since even photoshop, grammarly, or any other non-ai tool is labour a usable too.

        If we want humans doing stuff, why is a brushing tool acceptable? It’s not a human doing the work. So yeah the views here are extremely hypocritical.

        source

        • -> View More Comments