Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 days agoRight but to detect close-enough spellings and word orders, using a curated index or catalogue of accepted examples, is one thing.
To train layers of algorithms in layers of machines on massive datasets to come up with close enoughs would be that but many times over the costs.
You would be a moron to use llms for spellchecking.
To clarify to you, not all programs are equal. Its not all different methods to do the same thing at the same cost.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 days ago
A tool is a tool dude. Why are you trying to justify one over the other?
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Ok but why the fuck do you think it’s okay to use a wrecking ball for a task that requires a chisel? You’re creating low quality high cost work just because it’s fast and easy.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Why do you think grammarly is a thing dude…?
People ALREADY use an llm for spellcheck, and it’s acceptable, yet this crosses a line…?
It’s always funny what people will find acceptable, but also balk at when it’s fundamentally the exact same thing.
Of these devs want to claim “no ai” and everything is human, than they can’t rely on spellcheck either. Both are automated tools no?
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Grammarly predates commercial generative AI, as I attempted to explain to you before. It’s over a decade old. You clearly don’t understand the core mechanisms of any of these things.