‘Top Gun 3’ in the Works at Paramount

Comments

• setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I am concerned.

  source

  • Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Why?

    source

    • setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I am concerned that words like “franchise” and “reboot” and “next generation” were being tossed around by studio executives.

      Tom Cruise’s character was closed out rather gracefully. I am concerned that the quality of any follow up movies will be questionable. Top Gun was never designed to be a franchise and the fact that it managed one good sequel is remarkable.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• GCanuck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I understand that American military propaganda is a very popular movie flavour… shoot, I enjoy it myself… But that second movie was just soooo bad. I could barely finish it. It was only through morbid curiosity that I was able to get through it.

  source

  • Anticorp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It received tons of accolades, so I was quite surprised when I actually watched it. It was… okay.

    source
  • Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I didn’t even watch it. Thanks for confirming my suspicions on how bland he is and how terribly boring the movie would be.

    source
• Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Another boring cookie cutter no talent tom movie I won’t be watching.

  source
• BertramDitore@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I posted this 1990 quote from Cruise in a similar thread, but it’s relevant here too:

  “I want the kids to know that’s not the way war is. That’s why I didn’t go on and make ‘Top Gun II’ and ‘III’ and ‘IV’ and ‘V.’ That would have been irresponsible.”

  Source

  source