So surely no corporations or governments will be using them to remote in, right?
UK households could face VPN 'ban' after use skyrockets following Online Safety Bill
Submitted 1 day ago by MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/uk-households-could-face-vpn-32152789
Comments
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 day ago
myrmidex@belgae.social 1 day ago
One app maker told the BBC it had seen an 1,800% spike in downloads. “Many of these free VPNs are riddled with issues,” said Daniel Card, a cyber-security expert with the Chartered Institute for IT (BCS).
“Some act as traffic brokers for data harvesting firms, others are so poorly built they expose users to attacks.”
He told the BBC despite posing a range of potential privacy risks, such apps “end up in the hands of kids trying to watch age-restricted content”, or adults “trying to get round blocks”.
Ah yes, there it is: won’t anyone think of the children. I expected that argument higher up.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
The UK politicians who thought this was a good idea deserve a “ban”
Seriously, how did they not see this coming?
monogram@feddit.nl 1 day ago
Here’s a free vpn that will keep you safe enough to watch porn on: protonvpn.com
Psythik@lemmy.world 1 day ago
And if you don’t want to use a sketchy free VPN: mullvad.net/en/vpn
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 day ago
UK: from the EU to the Uzbekistan of the Atlantic.
msage@programming.dev 1 day ago
EU is working on that, too
IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
what’s with the clickbait headline.
Linked source says opposite
Headline “Labour rules out VPN ban in UK but issues warning to UK households”
Byline “Labour won’t ban the use of Virtual Private Networks”
doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 1 day ago
yeonmi-park in china, the ccp will punish you if you go around their internet firewall
baggins@beehaw.org 1 day ago
I can’t see anywhere in the article that says they may be ‘banned’.
They can try though. They can also try and collect water in a sieve.
towerful@programming.dev 1 day ago
Eh, a back bencher has called for a report on how VPNs interfere with ofcoms ability to enforce/regulate the online safety act within 6 months.
independent.co.uk/…/vpns-online-safety-bill-labou…
"My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.
“If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.”
The likely conclusion of that report is that “VPNs circumvent the age verification requirement, so circumvent the OSA, so VPNs must be banned”
baggins@beehaw.org 1 day ago
Yes, I read that. ‘Likely conclusion’ does not equal a ban though.
I’m just being a bit pedantic about the headline - this whole thing is crappy (and unworkable) enough as it is, without jumping to conclusions.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Somehow I don’t see this being a popular move
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
OOOHH yeah, let’s ban a standardized security system because we’re idiots
Politicians always look like that kid with a propellor cap on their head
Abrinoxus@lemmy.today 1 day ago
“Keep calm and give up all and everything for your own safety”
vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Please do it
WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 1 day ago
Why? How is any of this a good thing?
vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 day ago
I just remember how Roscomnadzor started banning everything
-
they’ve banned 127.0.0.1
-
they banned all telegram IP ranges, downing card payments in the country
-
they learned how to ban wireguard in the whole country, effectively ruining a lot of internal contours
-
ebolapie@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Maybe they just really hate the uk
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
It would make the public hate the politicians who came up with the online safety bill in the first place
limer@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
It’s like watching an online version of Brexit, without the referendum