Publicly available police reports.
I'm completely against doxxing. But there were public reports. That's censorship.
Submitted 17 hours ago by cm0002@mander.xyz to technology@lemmy.zip
https://kolektiva.social/@alissaazar/115781985482592177
Publicly available police reports.
I'm completely against doxxing. But there were public reports. That's censorship.
That’s also what many other social media would do because it’s easier to ban posting of personal information regardless of where it came from because you can’t trust moderation you outsourced to some third world country to do proper checks.
Example:
No. Reddit is quite open and pro-free speech, but it is not okay to post someone’s personal information or post links to personal information. This includes links to public Facebook pages and screenshots of Facebook pages with the names still legible.
Posting someone’s personal information will get you banned. When posting screenshots, be sure to edit out any personally identifiable information to avoid running afoul of this rule.
can always come up with rationalizations but the fact remains there are other platforms that will not “cost optimize” it away.
shouldn’t really surprise anyone. Didn’t their CEO like several months ago pretty much defend a known fascist/tranphob on the platform and essentially told people who complained about it to “not post” out of protest? Also Bluesky is extremely quick to bend to the whims of whatever government body makes demands. They were one of the first sites to quickly implement age verification in the UK I believe.
Also Bluesky is extremely quick to bend to the whims of whatever government body makes demands. They were one of the first sites to quickly implement age verification in the UK I believe.
LOL what did you expect them to do, exactly? They can either comply with the law or be fined to death. Those are their choices.
wow if we can’t trust me jack dorsey who can we even trust anymore‽
bsky not run by jack
Oh no, surprise, censorship on a centralized platform. No one saw that coming.
He got banned for doxxing? Is that right?
I never trust anyone who says “I got banned from for saying _”. I’ve never seen that claim match the reality of what happened. I hope he posted proof somewhere at some point
*I don’t use Bluesky
I don’t think sharing publicly available documents constitutes doxxing
Even if it is, doxxing nazis is a good thing.
There are no bans on nostr. And we desperately need more antifa to drown out the 3 white supremacists we can’t ban
You have a bunch of white supremacists because there are no bans…
Except we can do shit about it, because there are no bans. That’s what you have backwards and that’s how they trick you into letting them increasingly take ownership of every discussion space in society
Oh my, what’s that thing? I tried nostr earlier this year after reading about their tech side and finding it interesting, but then I met their human side and… it was shocking (I lack words to properly explain the feeling). Most posts were (in order of cryptocurrency praising like it’s 2015, bashing on leftism, some weird humor I didn’t understand (maybe it was better not to understand), anti-government stuff, racist memes and a (maybe lost) user that posted some beautiful photos they took as amaetur photography practice. I literally stopped scrolling and uninstalled it when I saw a post claiming that pasteurizing milk is a genocide and an act from the government against us (the other users were even endorsing it!)
Definitely a good technology overrun with cultists. Better content curation tools & more users will fix it
Heads up, I sometimes post screenshots of replies like this as examples of how nostr looks to outsiders, because those cultists act confused about why no one joins
Meta doesnt own Bluesky, you’re thinking of Threads.
no that was in fact the Bluesky CEO. See: techcrunch.com/2025/10/05/waffles-eat-bluesky/
🎻
Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
ill never understand how jack fucking dorsey is regrifting the internet AGAIN with a centralized censorship engine.
fuck this dude entirely
sam@piefed.ca 10 hours ago
I’m pretty sure he has nothing to do with bluesky. i think he’s into nostr now.
73ms@sopuli.xyz 4 hours ago
Nothing might be going too far. He left the board since it wasn’t good PR for them but Bluesky is not transparent about its ownership and Dorsey could well still have a stake in it.
Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
that might explain why nostr is filled with rypto bros and racists. nostr world is toxic
SethTaylor@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
He doesn’t own or work at Bluesky
Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluesky
Image
He founded it, but he did indeed leave in 2024, i missed that bit of news
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Because for Americans when something went wrong it can never be a systemic issue by design. It was because all the fault of a person.
See also why they keep voting Democrat.(but this time fresh new blood will change it for real!)
frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
What are you even on about?