X’s deepfake porn feature clearly violates app store guidelines. Why won’t Apple and Google pull it?

Comments

• Kalon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Why won’t X be held liable for distribution of child pornography?

  source

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Pedophile in chief probably personally intervened.

    source
  • snoons@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Manufacturing consent is the name of the game. The bottom line is money, nobody gives a FUCK.

    System of a Down -

    source

    • SARGE@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      4,000 hungry children leave us per hour from starvation, while BILLIONS are spent on BOMBS

      CREATING DEATH SHOWERS

      source
  • artyom@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    You can’t blame a computer for what it does. Only the user who asks for the content is to blame. /s

    source
  • sausager@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    According to this article it doesn’t actually put out porn or child porn

    source
  • kungen@feddit.nu ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I think it’s disgusting that X probably doesn’t see a problem with it, but it still wouldn’t be legally classified as CSAM, no?

    source

    • ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      In some places it is CSAM and in others it is being working into convert into law.

      I think the issues are:

      • It can pass as real
      • Unlike run-of-the-mill cartoon porn, real photos of children (even not CSAM) are involved, either in the training or as input for the generation

      source
• Cruxifux@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Why do you think? Rules are for poor people.

  source
• slothrop@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Because billionaires.

  source
• Bristlecone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  A: money

  source
• belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Billionaires have the tightest class solidarity

  source
• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Cowards.

  source

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Coward$.

    source
• jasoman@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Cause they found funding fascism was easier.

  source
• doleo@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I’m not going to use that website to check, but is nobody making Tim Apple deepfakes to goad him? Cant somebody just ask it to recreate that emo-Elon picture that he tried to ban?

  source
• 4am@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Could Elon buy them? Does he have that much wealth power?

  source

  • naom3@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Google and apple? Absolutely zero chance of him doing that on his own. They each have a market capitalization of almost $4 trillion, and even though he’d only have to buy 51% of them that’s still way more than his net worth. And that’s not getting into how most of his wealth is in the form of tesla stock, which he can’t sell to much of without tanking the stock price. Plus corporations have ways to stop people who are trying to buy them out if they don’t want to be sold, like even though twitter was a publicly traded company musk still had to negotiate a deal with twitter’s management

    He might be able to buy a significant portion of one or both companies stocks and then be able to vote for board members and stuff and try to gain influence that way, but that’s not the same as owning a controlling stake in the company, and frankly I don’t see him politically out manoeuvring alphabet or apple’s existing boards of directors

    source
  • TheRealKuni@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Nah. He can’t buy Apple (market cap $3.8T), or Google ($3.96T). He’s not a trillionaire yet.

    source

    • calliope@retrolemmy.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      To put it into perspective, if he managed to sell all of his ownerships of companies for the most optimistic idea of his current net worth*, he could still buy less than 19% of Apple.

      He’d need several friends to chip in to even get to 50%. A trillion is a lot until inflation gets out of hand.

      * $717 billion; probably $100 million too high at least

      source