Here’s the compromise.
You go shoot your fucking self, and we won’t do it for you
Submitted 3 weeks ago by Lemmynated@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
Here’s the compromise.
You go shoot your fucking self, and we won’t do it for you
How’s “no”? Does “no” work?
Say it to a cop and find out?
(Please, don’t.)
Amazing how since the beginning of policing, officers have managed to do their work without these cameras. Maybe they should just do that for the safety part and flock should just stop existing as a company for the privacy part.
“To Serve & Protect” is just a slogan, not a tenet. 🤷🏼♂️
Flock Safety faces a growing public outcry over concerns that its surveillance technology
could be misusedhas already been repeatedly and predictably misused.
FIFY
Flock Safety faces a growing public outcry over
concerns that its surveillancetechnologycould be misused has already been repeatedly andpredictablyed misused.
FITFY
how about flock stop working with the government and sell a product instead of a bullshit service
But, but, but… think of the shareholders!
How’s this fie the comprise: we’ll only guillotine you, instead of you and your family
People will stop tearing down cameras, and in exchange, flock will do it themselves. Sounds like a solid compromise to me.
No kidding. Their proposed safety features to stop police stalking make the police accountable to themselves. Oh, and the police can shut off some of those safety features, and again, it’s up to the police to catch them.
The world is one big kangaroo court and we gave all the children guns.
Let’s be clear, the kids with guns we’re focused on (as a “country”) are the ones bringing them to school, and it’s the no-dick adult backbirths with guns who’re the salient problem here.
I’d be down for a compromise
However that’s probably not what Flock wants
Might be off-topic, but back in my youth, the night before Halloween was Devil’s Night: when Detroit was lit by the flames of ill-conceived arson & related “pranks”. 🤷🏼♂️
sorghum@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
How about no?