Submitted 16 hours ago by Lemmynated@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
No kidding. Their proposed safety features to stop police stalking make the police accountable to themselves. Oh, and the police can shut off some of those safety features, and again, it’s up to the police to catch them.
The world is one big kangaroo court and we gave all the children guns.
How’s this fie the comprise: we’ll only guillotine you, instead of you and your family
How about no?
Flock Safety faces a growing public outcry over concerns that its surveillance technology
could be misusedhas already been repeatedly and predictably misused.
FIFY
Here’s the compromise.
You go shoot your fucking self, and we won’t do it for you
how about flock stop working with the government and sell a product instead of a bullshit service
Amazing how since the beginning of policing, officers have managed to do their work without these cameras. Maybe they should just do that for the safety part and flock should just stop existing as a company for the privacy part.
How’s “no”? Does “no” work?
I’d be down for a compromise
However that’s probably not what Flock wants
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
People will stop tearing down cameras, and in exchange, flock will do it themselves. Sounds like a solid compromise to me.