Google’s AI model is getting really good at spoofing phone photos

Comments

• stoy@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  So how long untill digital photos are inadmissble in court?

  source
• Longylonglong@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I mean of course it is. It got basically infinite training data

  source
• calliope@retrolemmy.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Seems like a thinly-veiled ad for a new version of google’s ai image generation.

  source

  • Hackworth@piefed.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Yeah, a more honest take would discuss the strengths & weakness of the model. Flux is still better at text than Nano Banana, for instance. There’s no “one model to rule them all,” as much as tech journalism seems to wants to write like that.

    source
• Assian_Candor@hexbear.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  The phone is a lie box, return to magnetic tape

  source
• Hackworth@piefed.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Y5DNKiRACKxc1GM.jpg

  Nano Banana Pro’s built into Photoshop now.

  source
• bonenode@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I feel the bus one is actually quite easy to spot as fake. There’s no one with head down looking at their phone.

  source

  • Sinaf@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Image

    Image

    Most of these images have really shitty resolution as well. Can’t they make higher res stuff or would inconsistencies be blatantly obvious, if they did?

    source

    • Hackworth@piefed.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Directly, generating higher res stuff requires way more compute. But there are plenty of AI upscalers out there, some better, some worse. These are also built into Photoshop now. The difference between an AI image that is easy to spot and hard to spot is using good models. The difference between an AI image that is hard to spot and nearly impossible to spot is another 20 min of work in post.

      source
• 1984@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Nothing will feel real, and we will own nothing.

  source