Comment

Comment on There's a reason we aren't as harsh on the Steam Deck. Actually, a couple.

conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

If I’m playing modern games on a TV? PS5 easy. But still the pro over the deck.

I love my deck. As the handheld it’s intended to be. It’s not powerful enough for an acceptable experience running a AAA 3D game on a TV screen. You can ignore the resolution and artifacts and just generally low visual quality and poor frame rate on a small screen, because playing the games portably at all is a huge step up. You can’t ignore any part of it on a TV. It’s fine for indie games, older games, 2D stuff, etc.

But it doesn’t have the performance for a good living room experience if you’re looking to play modern AAA games. (Ignoring all their bullshit rootkits on PC that block a lot of multiplayer games out completely, which are the games you have to pay for on PS. You just can’t play most of them on Linux at all.)

source

Sort:hotnew top

prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Yup. As someone who hasn’t had a dedicated gaming PC in about a decade, I’ve been really happy with the PS5 + Steam Deck combo (well, plus Switch, but that thing collects dust until Nintendo releases a Mario platformer).

I recently got a laptop that’s not made for gaming specifically, but can handle them pretty well (with Proton), and that has scratched any itch I’ve had for PC games that don’t lend themselves to Deck or console (your RTS games and such).

At risk of giving away the game… I think people would be very surprised to see how cheap physical copies of PS4 and PS5 games go for when you catch them on sale.

source
- conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  I love my Steam deck, and bounce between how heavily I use it vs the switch* or PS5 depending on the games I’m into at the moment. But misrepresenting its utility as a modern living room PC doesn’t help anyone and is just going to leave people disappointed.
  
  The PS5 is probably my smallest library (and mostly PS4 games, a lot of which were before I had a PC), but it’s definitely plenty capable and I don’t regret the purchase at all. (The controller is also the coolest non graphics addition to gaming I’ve experienced in a long time).
  
  *The switch desperately needs a 3rd party replacement for the controllers, though, because the joycons are bad brand new.
  
  source
  - prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    
    But misrepresenting its utility as a modern living room PC doesn’t help anyone and is just going to leave people disappointed.
    
    Did I do this?
    
    source
    conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    No, the OP did.
    
    source
MindTraveller@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Y’all just picky. 720 was fine 20 years ago and it’s fine now.

source
- Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Black and white TV was fine 60 years ago and it’s fine now
  
  source
- Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  20 years ago was pre-bluray, so the most common video media was dvd with resolution of 720 × 480 (480p). So 720p was really good 20 years ago.
  
  source
  - nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    That, and monitor/TV size increased a lot at the time when flat panels became a thing, so you need a higher resolution to achieve the same pixel density.
    
    source
    Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Well also the change to pixel based screens from CRTs meant that you needed higher resolution for the picture to look comparitively good.
    
    source
- XTL@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  It was not. 30 years ago, it would have been very good, though, as a lot of media was still SD.
  
  source