Valve tells Ars its “trying to unblock” limits caused by open source driver issues.
Valve tells Ars its “trying to unblock” limits caused by
open source driverclosed source corporate megalomania issues.
FTFthem. Open Source is not the problem here.
Submitted 16 hours ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to gaming@lemmy.zip
Valve tells Ars its “trying to unblock” limits caused by open source driver issues.
Valve tells Ars its “trying to unblock” limits caused by
open source driverclosed source corporate megalomania issues.
FTFthem. Open Source is not the problem here.
Surprised they didn’t take the opportunity to push DisplayPort a little more.
the problem is although its a pc, valve wants it to sort of appeal to console users. and the problem is that the HDMI forum members are also TV manufacturers. they are very unlikely to ever support displayport.
as long as TVs are more popular than monitors, that trend of HDMI holding control will never cease.
I’m a little disappointed, but not surprised. This thing is designed to be used in the living room hooked up to the TV, after all.
The fact of A/V consumer electronics standardizing on HDMI instead of DisplayPort is kinda not Valve’s problem to solve, as much as I’d like it to try.
Is display port better in this regard?
Yes, as the standard is more or less open source. There are no barriers to entry.
That’s what I suspected. So rather than fighting HDMI, we need to buy display port instead.
Greed.
DisplayPort4eva
Is it licensing fees? I bet it is.
Is it licensing fees? I bet it is.
From the article:
the HDMI Forum (which manages the official specifications for HDMI standards) has officially blocked any open source implementation of HDMI 2.1. That means the open source AMD drivers used by SteamOS can’t fully implement certain features that are specific to the updated output standard.
And that’s why HDMI can fuck right off. Display Port is new bae.
Man, I fucking hate HDMI.
Wonder if they can ship a proprietary HDMI part of the driver or if there’s going to be an unofficial 2.1 driver patch that can be installed down the line.
who@feddit.org 15 hours ago
Empricorn@feddit.nl 15 hours ago
Assholes.
Croquette@sh.itjust.works 14 hours ago
They want to make money
slazer2au@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
And here are those companies making that decision
hdmiforum.org/members/
blinfabian@feddit.nl 4 hours ago
so pretty much all important companies ☹️
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 14 hours ago
I’m glad more people are hearing how it’s this group of standards assholes who are causing it.
MrSoup@lemmy.zip 13 hours ago
sorghum@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
I really wish displayport on TVs would take off.
Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
How, though? I’m not terribly knowledgeable about the law, but I know interoperability is one of the major sources of exceptions to copyright protection, and the whole Google vs Oracle saga would imply there’s nothing illegal about making your own implementation of a standard without permission.
freeman@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
AMD is a member of the HDMI consortium and is probably bound by private agreements to not make open source drivers without permission from the consortium. They did try to get them to budge but they didn’t.
grue@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws are all entirely different and have almost nothing to do with each other (don’t be fooled by the property-rights-hating shysters who try to gaslight you into lumping them all as “intellectual property[sic]”).
Trademarks and patents don’t have the same kinds of interoperability exceptions that copyright does, and you can’t claim to “support HDMI™” without licensing rights to those in addition to whatever copyrighted code you might need for the software side of the implementation.