filister@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I just wish the SD was a bit more powerful. Recently especially with those UE5 games we need to install some custom scripts just to make them playable and usually they don’t even look good. I love the Deck, but Steam should really update the APU.
There hasn’t really been anything worthwhile to upgrade to yet. More powerful handhelds do exist, but most make use of APUs that are 50-100% more power hungry, while not actually achieving that much of a performance increase.
Valve is waiting for the next generation of 15W APUs, and meanwhile the new Ryzen Z2 A APU is actually based on the one made for the Deck because it’s still basically the most efficient APU they have.
Seems like the UE5 games can’t get steady framerates on most hardware, but I know what you mean.
I’m definitely looking forward to steam deck 2, but I do appreciate that Valve isn’t pushing out a new one each year with slightly improved specs. And now that the nintendo switch 2 has about the same power as the steam deck, maybe we’ll see UE5 and some other engines actually try to run well at that performance level.
Agreed. We don’t need it to perform like an RTX 5090 but just a smidge more power would get a ton of recent games into playable frame rates. I still don’t know how people play BG3 on the deck.
I requested a refund for BG3 because it’s not as good as a verified version IMO, but valve refused it.
I love my steam deck so much, but i really urgently want to buy the steam deck 2
I’ve been playing rogue trader on mine recently, I’d describe as playable, but it’s night and day different going through moonlight (which yeah, obviously). Satisfactory was able to get 40-60 pretty reliably.
How bad is bg3 on it?
You can get around 30FPS but you have to deal with heavy FSR artifacting and it looks terrible.
secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
I think it plenty powerful. Games are just so unoptimized it’s disgusting